Could You Appoint a Supreme Court Justice with an Opposing View on Roe. v. Wade?
I can try. I will look for people who think outside the box like I do. I would pick a Justice who will do something about those hideous black robes.
1 Comment
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
About
Ahmnodt Heare is a fictional character running a real campaign. He is an Independent candidate for President of the United States. His views on solving America’s problems is different than the ideas being offered by any Republican or Democratic candidate.
In the upcoming days, he will give a daily account of his political activities, campaigns, and other behind the scene activities like no other candidate ever has.
The purpose of this blog is to showing the absurdity of Ahmnodt Heare’s platform and show that the two major parties are equally absurd (especially at the federal level.)
If you are fed up with the two-party duopoly, then feel free to write in “Ahmnodt Heare” for the office of your choosing.
On Election Day, tell your fellow Americans, “Ahmnodt Heare!”
Ahmnodt Heare for America. Ahmnodt Heare for You.
Ahmnodt Heare for President 
Question: Could you appoint a Supreme Court Justice with an opposing view on Roe v. Wade?
Answer: Yes. My choice would reverse Roe v. Wade and make it “Wade v. Roe”.